MessiandNeymar

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Saturday, May 4, 2013

The Theoretical Minimum: a very short review

Posted on 10:00 AM by Unknown

I plowed through Susskind and Hrabovsky's The Theoretical Minimum: What You Need to Know to Start Doing Physics over the last month.

Here's the publisher's blurb:

The Theoretical Minimum is a book for anyone who has ever regretted not taking physics in college—or who simply wants to know how to think like a physicist. In this unconventional introduction, physicist Leonard Susskind and hacker-scientist George Hrabovsky offer a first course in physics and associated math for the ardent amateur. Unlike most popular physics books—which give readers a taste of what physicists know but shy away from equations or math—Susskind and Hrabovsky actually teach the skills you need to do physics, beginning with classical mechanics, yourself. Based on Susskind’s enormously popular Stanford University-based (and YouTube-featured) continuing-education course, the authors cover the minimum—the theoretical minimum of the title—that readers need to master to study more advanced topics.

An alternative to the conventional go-to-college method, The Theoretical Minimum provides a tool kit for amateur scientists to learn physics at their own pace.

The publisher's description is accurate, and the book delivers on the promise. It is well-written, clear, beautifully typeset, and covers the topics it sets out to cover.

The problem with this book, I think, is similar to that faced by the MOOC techniques (Udacity, etc.): it is simply very hard for students, even extremely motivated students, to master this material by reading a book. To really learn to do physics, you need to:

  • Hear it explained, in a variety of ways, from a variety of perspectives
  • Ask questions; stop and get a tough point explained in a different manner when the first explanation didn't click
  • Discuss the topics with other students
  • Attempt homework problems on your own; have them graded; return to the questions you got wrong, attempt them again, and continue until you can produce the solution yourself.
  • See examples of how to apply these techniques to a variety of problems
And so forth.

Perhaps a reasonable approach would be to combine a text such as The Theoretical Minimum with Professor Susskind's video lectures, then blend in something like Professor Michael Scatz's Physics I class on Coursera, and also add in a more in-depth textbook for additional substance.

But time is short; I enjoyed reading Susskind and Hrabovsky, and I'm now moving on to whatever piques my interest next.

Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Shelter
    I meant to post this as part of my article on Watership Down , but then totally forgot: Shelter In Shelter you experience the wild as a moth...
  • The Legend of 1900: a very short review
    Fifteen years late, we stumbled across The Legend of 1900 . I suspect that 1900 is the sort of movie that many people despise, and a few peo...
  • Rediscovering Watership Down
    As a child, I was a precocious and voracious reader. In my early teens, ravenous and impatient, I raced through Richard Adams's Watershi...
  • Must be a heck of a rainstorm in Donetsk
    During today's Euro 2012 match between Ukraine and France, the game was suspended due to weather conditions, which is a quite rare occur...
  • Beethoven and Jonathan Biss
    I'm really enjoying the latest Coursera class that I'm taking: Exploring Beethoven’s Piano Sonatas . This course takes an inside-out...
  • Starting today, the games count
    In honor of the occasion: The Autumn Wind is a pirate, Blustering in from sea, With a rollocking song, he sweeps along, Swaggering boisterou...
  • Parbuckling
    The enormous project to right and remove the remains of the Costa Concordia is now well underway. There's some nice reporting on the NP...
  • For your weekend reading
    I don't want you to be bored this weekend, so I thought I'd pass along some articles you might find interesting. If not, hopefully y...
  • Are some algorithms simply too hard to implement correctly?
    I recently got around to reading a rather old paper: McKusick and Ganger: Soft Updates: A Technique for Eliminating Most Synchronous Writes ...
  • Don't see me!
    When she was young, and she had done something she was embarrassed by or felt guilty about, my daughter would sometimes hold up her hand to ...

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (165)
    • ►  September (14)
    • ►  August (19)
    • ►  July (16)
    • ►  June (17)
    • ▼  May (17)
      • A few interesting articles
      • Buildings, rising and falling
      • Stuff I'm reading on a May afternoon
      • The intriguing theory of Expert Beginners
      • Some benchmarking principles
      • HotOS: Hot or not?
      • The Legend of 1900: a very short review
      • Gluttony
      • Wild: a very short review
      • C10M Resources
      • Andrew Simpson
      • Weekend reading
      • Bruce Sterling lights it up
      • Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy (2011): a very short review
      • The Theoretical Minimum: a very short review
      • Gaming
      • Dune, the mini-series: a very short review
    • ►  April (18)
    • ►  March (24)
    • ►  February (19)
    • ►  January (21)
  • ►  2012 (335)
    • ►  December (23)
    • ►  November (30)
    • ►  October (33)
    • ►  September (34)
    • ►  August (29)
    • ►  July (39)
    • ►  June (27)
    • ►  May (48)
    • ►  April (32)
    • ►  March (30)
    • ►  February (10)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile